Gradation between “Finding” and “Assembling”

We can not separately think about two things: finding useful information and building understanding based on the information. It is a continuous gradation from the reading focused on finding information to the reading focused on assembling information to build understanding. Either is not superior. It is a choice. You should choose based on what you want to do and the quality/content of the book.

British philosopher Francis Bacon compared the book to food. There are foods that you just want to taste a bit, foods that you want to swallow, and foods to chew and digest.

Some books are to be tasted, others to be swallowed, and some few to be chewed and digested: that is, some books are to be read only in parts, others to be read, but not curiously, and some few to be read wholly, and with diligence and attention. --- Francis Bacon. (1625). “Of Studies”

Think about the book which you are going to read. Do you only need to taste? Or do you need to chew and digest? en.icon

This page is auto-translated from [/nishio/(4.1.1.6) Gradation between “Finding” and “Assembling”](https://scrapbox.io/nishio/(4.1.1.6) Gradation between “Finding” and “Assembling”) using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.